Landscape painting tips - Stuart Ross -
Pond in Summer 2014, acrylic, 24 x 24 in. Collection the artist.

On landscape painting and more: Maine artist Stuart Ross suggests that we all paint an inner vision of life, not the reality of what we actually see. Does that idea free us to paint what we want to see?

By Stuart Ross

It may seem obvious to say the places recorded in landscape paintings don’t actually exist as they have been depicted, but by truly accepting that notion, artists can free themselves from the constraints of painting only what they observe. If they remind themselves that paintings present imaginary subjects originating in the minds of the artists, all options are open to the plein air painter.

Landscape painting tips - Stuart Ross -
View of the Marsh
2010 landscape painting, oil, 24 x 24 in. Collection the artist

Through the process of selecting, editing, transforming, combining, and rearranging the elements in nature, artists create a new reality, not an imitation of life. In other words, painters should be faithful to the physical demands of paint itself and the dictates of composition and color, and not necessarily to a precise image of nature. Turning life into art requires artifice.

A landscape painting by the great English artist John Constable (1776-1837) is not a reproduction of what he saw. The effectiveness of his compositions and the style of brush application make it clear he consciously chose a vantage point that controlled where he placed the viewer, determined by the relative scale of humans in that landscape, placed along the horizon line just where he wanted it, and concluded by the addition of a sky Constable saw the week before. This is what his paintings are about — the formal elements of a painting that come from a combination of observation, imagination, and design.

Related > Six Keys to Painting Trees with Character and Dimension

Landscape painting tips - Stuart Ross -
Skunk Cabbage Study
2014, acrylic, 30 x 30 in. Collection the artist

Similarly, no one can look closely at one of Claude Monet’s (1840-1926) magnificent water lily murals and think the artist was just recording nature. All one needs to do is get close to the thick paint on the surface of the rough canvas to see the abstract interpretation Monet created, and then back up so all those isolated swirls of paint coalesce to establish a new, believable reality to such an extent that observers almost need to hold on to something in order not to fall into the watery space.

Nature is messy, and there’s too much of it, so it is up to the artist to make art out of the raw materials available and to use a knowledge of composition, color, and paint handling to sort out that messy reality. In the case of Monet, one could say that he kept a certain amount of that messiness but ordered it according to an image that already existed in his mind. He created the pond, planted the water lilies, and built the foot bridges with the clear intention of giving himself a reference point with which to realize that mental image.

My own approach to landscape painting is a combination of working on location and in the studio. There is nothing else like painting outdoors, and if I do it enough I sharpen my observational skills, learn how to generalize from the particular, and determine how to select from the overwhelming amount of visual material. Moreover, I learn to work fast because the light is changing by the minute. There is no other way to learn to paint landscape but to get out into it and paint it.

The realities of weather and time, however, mean that it is often necessary to rely on sketches and photographs to complete a painting in the studio, and that is true of my larger landscapes. I find that I have trouble seeing a painting clearly until I get it back to the studio, away from the “distraction” of nature. I get a clearer view of it as to color and value, and I can take the time necessary to work on it without having to rush. I have the most success when I work outside on small canvases and make quick studies that can stand on their own but can also become part of the process of creating larger, more finished paintings.

Canyon Study 1
2000, watercolor, 6 x 9 in. Collection the artist. Plein air

Whether you find your landscape painting subjects in a back alley or in backcountry wilderness, what matters is what you do with the raw material given to you. There is no subject about which one can say, “No, that can’t be made into art.” For the artist painting landscapes is uniquely satisfying to be more and more fluent in the visual language that allows us to restructure and interpret what we see.

Canyon Study 2
2000, watercolor, 6 x 9 in. Collection the artist. Plein air

BIO: Stuart Ross has painted and exhibited in midcoast Maine for 40 years, finding unending visual interest in the watery local landscape. He has taught painting in various colleges including Colby College in Waterville, and at Midcoast Senior College in Bath, where he lives.

Click here to subscribe to PleinAir Today,
a free newsletter from the publishers of PleinAir Magazine.

Enter your best work in the
Plein Air Salon Art Competition
to win cash and publicity. 


  1. Interesting thoughts, but it may be more useful to make a kind of spectrum or scale, with a more objective, factual approach on one side ( some of Corot’s early Italian pictures) , and more subjective on the other end. Most would agree that Constable is more objective than later paintings by Turner, and certainly more objective than Monet’s water lilies ( which are in many ways a departure from his earlier works, which are, well, more objective — see the “Garden at St. Adresse.” ).
    Of course painting is not photography. But unless one is really disordered in their vision or thinking, there is little argument over whether or not someone got the proportions correct in their drawing of a building, a head, or even a tree, and for that matter, whether they got the colors right in a sky. Unless you go down a gloomy rabbit hole of pure solipsism, there is still plenty of objectivity to go around, and we should embrace it with gusto.
    And as for painting out doors, I think the most satisfying pictures are the ones where one at least takes a stance towards being truthful., even painfully so. My least favorite pictures at a plein air contest are those wherein the artist made a Turner sky when it was clearly a Kennset day. And guess what? These same artists will always tell me that they are free to “order reality.”
    Of course we are all free to do whatever we want. But truthfulness, or least an attempt towards it, will always be a “cardinal virtue” in painting from life.

  2. I love the idea at times realistic paintings seems to be to photographic realistic it takes away the fun of painting by adding more texture and shadows in bringing out certain characteristic futures in the painting to make it more appealing to the art lover (with realistic painting you might as well take a picture of it and print it on a canvas)


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here